Call us: +1. 714. 855. 9292

Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.

Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

What Moves You Up a Crypto Casino Tournament Leaderboard?

Homepage 2 › Forums › General › What Moves You Up a Crypto Casino Tournament Leaderboard?

This topic contains 2 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  Geremys 5 hours, 16 minutes ago.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #924531

    Geremys
    Participant

    The 24Casino entry in Web3Bet’s guide to newer sites mentions tournaments with prizes in BTC and USDT. I would be more interested in the scoring rules than the size of the prize. If one person plays ten rounds and another plays a hundred, can the person with fewer rounds rank higher? I am trying to see whether points come from total stakes, the best result, or some other measure. It would also help to know whether the leaderboard shows how each score was earned. Has anyone found tournament rules that answer those questions without needing to join the event first?

    #924532

    Voxick
    Participant

    A 40× spin could be the best result of my evening and still do nothing for my place on a leaderboard. That’s what I’d want to know before reading too much into a tournament banner. Web3Bet’s 24Casino profile mentions seasonal tournaments with prize pools in BTC and USDT. On a web3 casino page, those labels tell me what the prize pool is denominated in. I’d open the rules for the individual event to find out what actually moves a player up the board. Say two players enter a fictional weekend slot tournament. Maya makes 100 qualifying spins at 2 USDT apiece, so she wagers 200 USDT in total. Her biggest return is 24 USDT on one spin, or 12× her stake. Ellis makes 40 qualifying spins at 1 USDT each, for a total of 40 USDT. Their best spin returns 40 USDT, or 40×. I’d keep those four numbers handy because the same session looks very different depending on which figure the tournament uses. If the rules award one point for every USDT wagered on eligible games, Maya finishes with 200 points and Ellis has 40. Maya ranks higher because more qualifying money went through her spins. I find that kind of leaderboard easy to follow because I can reconcile the score with the stakes in my history. It would also be easy to misread 200 USDT wagered as 200 USDT lost. A player can wager the same funds again after a payout, so I’d need the session’s full results to know how either player finished financially. If the same tournament instead ranks players by their single highest payout multiplier, Ellis takes the higher spot with 40× and Maya comes behind at 12×. I can see the appeal of a format where a smaller stake can produce the top score. The downside is that once Ellis has logged 40×, ordinary wins leave that score where it is. I’d check the exact wording there. “Highest multiplier” compares the return with the stake, while “biggest payout” compares the amounts paid out. Those rules can put different people first when the players use different stakes. The details I’d look for are usually around the leaderboard or in the event’s promotion terms. I’d check the list of qualifying games, the minimum stake, whether bonus-funded spins count, and the time zone for the cutoff. If an event pays prizes in BTC but lets players wager in several currencies, I’d want to know how it converts stakes for a volume-based score. And if two people finish at 40×, I’d check whether the earlier result takes the higher spot or whether the prize is shared. Those are small details until the standings are close.

    #924533

    Geremys
    Participant

    Thank you very much!

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.